Commit aba5027e authored by unknown's avatar unknown
Browse files

Merge spachev@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 

into  asksasha.com:/reiser-data/mysql-dev/mysql-4.1-bug11139
parents abd4974f 3be8c907

mysql-test/r/rpl_multi_delete2.result

+26 −3
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -4,6 +4,26 @@ reset master; 
reset slave;

drop table if exists t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,t6,t7,t8,t9;

start slave;

set sql_log_bin=0;

create database mysqltest_from;

set sql_log_bin=1;

create database mysqltest_to;

use mysqltest_from;

drop table if exists a;

CREATE TABLE a (i INT);

INSERT INTO a VALUES(1);

DELETE alias FROM a alias WHERE alias.i=1;

SELECT * FROM a;

i

insert into a values(2),(3);

delete a alias FROM a alias where alias.i=2;

select * from a;

i

3

use mysqltest_to;

select * from a;

i

3

create table t1 (a int);

create table t2 (a int);

insert into t1 values (1);
@@ -15,7 +35,10 @@ select * from t2; 
a

1

select * from t1;

ERROR 42S02: Table 'test.t1' doesn't exist

ERROR 42S02: Table 'mysqltest_to.t1' doesn't exist

select * from t2;

ERROR 42S02: Table 'test.t2' doesn't exist

drop table t1,t2;
 
ERROR 42S02: Table 'mysqltest_to.t2' doesn't exist

set sql_log_bin=0;

drop database mysqltest_from;

set sql_log_bin=1;

drop database mysqltest_to;

mysql-test/t/rpl_multi_delete2-slave.opt

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line 
--replicate-wild-ignore-table=test.%
 
"--replicate-rewrite-db=mysqltest_from->mysqltest_to" --replicate-do-table=mysqltest_to.a

mysql-test/t/rpl_multi_delete2.test

+44 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line 
#multi delete replication bugs 





source include/master-slave.inc;



#BUG#11139 - improper wild-table and table rules

#checking for multi deletes with an alias



connection master;

set sql_log_bin=0;

create database mysqltest_from;

set sql_log_bin=1;



connection slave;

create database mysqltest_to;





connection master;

use mysqltest_from;

--disable_warnings

drop table if exists a;

--enable_warnings

CREATE TABLE a (i INT);

INSERT INTO a VALUES(1);

DELETE alias FROM a alias WHERE alias.i=1;

SELECT * FROM a;

insert into a values(2),(3);

delete a alias FROM a alias where alias.i=2;

select * from a;

save_master_pos;

connection slave;



use mysqltest_to;

sync_with_master;

select * from a;



# BUG#3461

connection master;

create table t1 (a int);

create table t2 (a int);
@@ -19,7 +56,13 @@ select * from t1; 
error 1146;

select * from t2;



# cleanup

connection master;

drop table t1,t2;

set sql_log_bin=0;

drop database mysqltest_from;

set sql_log_bin=1;

connection slave;

drop database mysqltest_to;



# End of 4.1 tests

sql/mysql_priv.h

+2 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ void kill_one_thread(THD *thd, ulong id); 
bool net_request_file(NET* net, const char* fname);

char* query_table_status(THD *thd,const char *db,const char *table_name);





#define x_free(A)	{ my_free((gptr) (A),MYF(MY_WME | MY_FAE | MY_ALLOW_ZERO_PTR)); }

#define safeFree(x)	{ if(x) { my_free((gptr) x,MYF(0)); x = NULL; } }

#define PREV_BITS(type,A)	((type) (((type) 1 << (A)) -1))
@@ -464,6 +465,7 @@ void mysql_reset_thd_for_next_command(THD *thd); 
bool mysql_new_select(LEX *lex, bool move_down);

void create_select_for_variable(const char *var_name);

void mysql_init_multi_delete(LEX *lex);

void fix_multi_delete_lex(LEX* lex);

void init_max_user_conn(void);

void init_update_queries(void);

void free_max_user_conn(void);

sql/slave.cc

+1 −8
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -746,14 +746,7 @@ static TABLE_RULE_ENT* find_wild(DYNAMIC_ARRAY *a, const char* key, int len) 
    rules (see code below). For that reason, users should not set conflicting 

    rules because they may get unpredicted results (precedence order is

    explained in the manual).

    If no table of the list is marked "updating" (so far this can only happen

    if the statement is a multi-delete (SQLCOM_DELETE_MULTI) and the "tables"

    is the tables in the FROM): then we always return 0, because there is no

    reason we play this statement on this slave if it updates nothing. In the

    case of SQLCOM_DELETE_MULTI, there will be a second call to tables_ok(),

    with tables having "updating==TRUE" (those after the DELETE), so this

    second call will make the decision (because

    all_tables_not_ok() = !tables_ok(1st_list) && !tables_ok(2nd_list)).

    



  RETURN VALUES

    0           should not be logged/replicated